Windows 7 7229 Leaks, Not RTM Escrow

Reports are coming in from some of our readers and supporters that Windows 7 Build 7229 has been leaked to the Internet. It is however not the RTM Escrow build that everyone is expecting. Both the 32-bit and 64-bit release of Windows 7 build 7229 has been leaked and are already available on various P2P networks.

MICROSOFT.WINDOWS.7.LAST.RRP.7229.0.090604-1901.X86.ENGLISH.DVD.
BUILD: 6.1.7229.0.winmain.090604-1901 – last WinIQ SIGNOFF build!
7229.0.090604-1901_x86fre_client_en-us_OEM_Ultimate-GRMCULFREO_EN_DVD.iso
SIZE: 2,544,758,784 byte
MD5: B4C090F45F2A6CE136C4413A8E56A631
SHA1: B3FEC2CFC05B6004864AB7EF99A1F9C7EE8D8BA4
CRС: B1BBD756
by SUKONKA

MICROSOFT.WINDOWS.7.LAST.RRP.7229.0.090604-1901.X64.ENGLISH.DVD.
BUILD: 6.1.7229.0.winmain.090604-1901 – last WinIQ SIGNOFF build!
7229.0.090604-1901_x64fre_client_en-us_OEM_Ultimate-GRMCULXFREO_EN_DVD.iso
SIZE: 3,262,218,240 byte
MD5: 32460CB7ABB9BF5EAC65AEA7034C798B
SHA1: F3DF1990D9242C48BC56515534911838DF0ABEA9
CRС: 04FC6B18
by SUKONKA

Wzor are also reporting news about build 7231 and have already posted some screenshots of that build and report that the build has also leaked.

MICROSOFT.WINDOWS.7.BUILD.7231.WINMAIN.X86.VHD.ENGLISH-WZT
FILE: 7231.0.x86fre.winmain.090608-1900.client_en-us.ultimate.vhd
(the original VHD in packed RAR archive, size RAR file: 1,956,847,719 byte
SHA1: E947CB5AAD1DB581162C1F44F97C9B0E49E70E0A)
SIZE: 5,214,876,672 byte
CRC: 5710D7DF
MD5: E11D5A0BE7EC9379141A07F831DE87ED
SHA1: D6315A1D8D89D30D7EA948AD93D572203D155193

7231-0-x86fre-winmain-090608-1900-client_en-us-ultimate-vhd_6

Picture 6 of 6

More Galleries: All GalleriesWindows 7 GalleriesWindows 8 Galleries

2 Comments left so far


Signup For Newsletter

Related Posts

, ,

2 Responses to Windows 7 7229 Leaks, Not RTM Escrow

Send me updates when comments are left

  1. Martin June 12, 2009 at 7:59 pm #

    Alex the username and password are displayed on the front page.

  2. Me June 12, 2009 at 10:06 pm #

    Which front page are you referring to Martin?

Leave a Reply